In reply to The Freedom Not To Participate | Popehat
I start with the premise that if money is speech, I want as many of my measly dollars as possible to be lifting their voices in accord with my values. The way I see it, individual citizens don't have enough ways to influence the world as it is, and I'm certainly not going to willingly fail to use an agent of change I have at my disposal.
Beyond that, I think a whole lot of what we do in this world speaks to and in effect casts a vote for one's values regardless–whether one does or doesn't purchase Chick-fil-A over the company's social stands or because they love (or hate) the food, the advertising, the way the drive-thru's work, or for any other reason, that person is speaking up for their values.
To me, paying attention to both the value of the products and the sociopolitical values of the people who create them are important. I prefer to reward those who agree with me and ignore (if not outright punish) those who don't, including via my wallet–another way I express myself, money being speech, n'all….
Some folks just like chicken (or prefer pizza).
That's America, in a nutshell.
Some folks will consume all the news they can, learning about all the issues and carefully weighing the strengths and weaknesses of each candidate. Other folks will vote for the one who looks a lot like their favorite movie actor or whose mother was born just two towns over. Values, either way.
---
Posted Jul 28, 2012 @3:35 pm
NOEM ISN'T PULLING MILLER UNDER THE BUS -- SHE'S USING HIM AS A HUMAN SHIELD
-
The White House response to public outrage over events in Minnesota is being
described in some quarters as a "circular firing squad." Some people don't
bel...
22 hours ago
No comments:
Post a Comment