In reply to various comments (noted below) at the post Gay Marriage is Not a Civil Right
---
Response to the original post: Wingnuts and Moonbats: Is there a right to marry whomever one wishes?
Paco has it right. One's religious beliefs should not be the basis for US law.
bluespapa asks a good question about polygamy, in light of the two gentlemen's (& by implication of his quote, Nero's) citing of "thousands of years of universally recognized morality and practice".
@ Nikki "A few months ago I did a post on whether or not gay marriage advocates would be willing to extend their argument to include polygamy...not one would give it the same importance as gay marriage."
Of course they didn't. Very few people are asking for any such thing, and reducing an argument to the absurd does nothing to speak to the issue at hand. Should folks wish for & want polygamy, respond to it then... In the meantime, it's no better than counting the angels one imagines can dance on pinpoints....
@ That guy: "Proposition 8 takes away no rights from gay Californians. It simply overturns the rule of 4 state judges, and returns the law to the majority position as it had been prior, with a state constitutional amendment."
You say that as though you have no respect for our American system of justice and law. Those four state judges read the state Constitution before them as written, saw that there was no basis to deny equal protection to gay couples wishing to marry, and ruled that it was against the CA Constitution to do so.
"The majority of Americans agree with "these views," so why should they be beaten into submission by a crazed radical minority, many of whom are Godless and detest the very traditions that are the strength of this country?"
First off, if you're not gay, nothing will change for you. You're not being beaten into submission to anything.
Second, belief in God has little bearing on American rights & law. The Godless deserve as much protection under US law as the faithful.
Traditions are nice, but they are subject to change over time, as are the one's folks view as "the strength of this country"... Just ask those blacks who're descended from slaves (once viewed as the backbone of this country, and impossible to do without...), or the women who once had no right to vote, own property, ... Things change.
I believe Phillip Chandler has your number, dude. Please reply to him with the same thought he offered in his comment, as to do less would only increase the offense your post is offering him.
---
Posted November 9, 2008, 12:16 AM
KIM JONG UN + DEUTSCHE BANK + TRUMP'S MIT UNCLE + LINDSEY GRAHAM + BARRON =
ELON MUSK
-
I keep trying to understand why Donald Trump hasn't parted ways with Elon
Musk yet, even though nearly everyone believes he will. The formula above
is the ...
4 hours ago
No comments:
Post a Comment