In reply: It's STILL not what Rand Paul would've done then, but what he'd do in future, if elected

In reply to: UPDATE: More raw video: Rand Paul sits down with Joe Arnold to address recent controversial statements - WHAS11.com Louisville Blogs
---

As I left my last comment before the additional video, I figured I'd come on back, if only to say that the new piece changes very little of what I said initially...

What Rand Paul has said about the CRA (and the Americans with Disabilities Act, and the Fair Housing Act, and ..., and ...), especially when looked at as a whole, brings into question how the man will vote in future, when there are new bills that want to impose government solutions to societal problems no less important than the ones addressed by the CRA, the ADA, and Fair Housing laws. If, as he admits, Rand Paul has issues with these "settled laws" from the past, it certainly brings into question how he'll vote in similar situations, should he be elected.

The time to question him on these kinda issues is now, not once he's in office, and I hope whatever local and "friendly" media Dr. Paul feels comfortable putting himself in front of will ask many such questions.
---
Posted May 27, 2010 at 6:40 AM (No comment links)

Previously:
In reply: It's not what Rand Paul would've done then, but what he'd do in future, if elected