In reply to: Did the Tea Party win the debate over the N-word accusations? - Washington Examiner
---
No, I don't believe Breitbart and the Tea Party crowd have won much of anything, here. For all his bluster, @andrewbreitbart has no more proof that the incident never happened than the congressmen have that it did.
Sure, it would be nice if there were some kinda audio or video footage conclusively proving the words were or were not spoken, but I'm pretty sure that trees falling in the middle of the forest make noise, even when no one captures the sound on tape. And as the great 'pubbie philosopher once said, "absence of evidence is not evidence of absence."
The eye witness testimony of the congressmen--and the tea party protesters, too--is apparently the only evidence there is, and after that, it all comes down to who we each find more credible. It's not surprising that for activists, anyway, the divide between who folks find more trustworthy falls along partisan lines.
---
Wingnuts and Moonbats X-post
"ANTI-INTERVENTIONIST" MAGA COMMENTATORS ARE BEING AWFULLY POLITE ABOUT
PRO-INTERVENTION JOE LIEBERMAN
-
Commentators frequently tell us that right-wingers in the era of Donald
Trump have abandoned internationalism and interventionism in favor of
"America firs...
8 hours ago
No comments:
Post a Comment